The Nobel Appeasement Prize
by Bill Wilson
And the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize goes to - drum roll please - the man who
occupies the Oval Office. Yes, you read me right, OOO has won the Nobel Peace
Prize. April Fools' Day has come six months early for some, six months late for
others. The Nobel prize is now officially on the list of grand political jokes.
They say he won it because of reaching out to the Muslim world, banning
interrogation techniques that might be considered torture, promoting peace by
bringing a new global monetary policy to the nations, and deciding not to deploy
missiles in Europe. He also has made a public commitment to end the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
But Americans may find OOO's actions far less peace oriented. Perhaps a new name
for the Nobel prize is in order - the Nobel Appeasement Prize. If this were the
case, OOO would win hands down in a way that would engender an all-knowing smile
from Neville Chamberlain emanating from his eternal post in the depths of the
pit of Hades.
Appeasing the Muslim world with a landmark speech in Cairo to a bulk group of
terrorists and terrorist sympathizers; extending the olive branch to the world's
foremost sponsor of terrorism in Iran; threatening the peace loving state of
Israel that its American ally's efforts against Iranian nuclear proliferation is
tied directly to Israel's acceptance of a Palestinian terrorist state; releasing
terrorists into society by closing the terrorist prison in Cuba; restoring
diplomatic relations with the second foremost sponsor of terrorism, Syria;
scuttling a planned defensive missile program in Poland and the Czech Republic
that was designed to defend against a future terrorist missile launch from Iran;
Ignoring a general's advice by understaffing the military in Afghanistan while
brave American soldiers are dying in increasing attacks by terrorists; yielding
the sovereignty of the American economy to the International Monetary Fund;
supporting a dictator for life wannabe in Honduras over its Constitutional
Republic; banning mission critical terrorist identification and tracking
techniques...
As an American, I do not feel too peaceful about the actions of this
administration. Sources I have interviewed who are involved or were involved in
national security say that the Islamic terrorist network is emboldened by the
actions of this White House and that, by banning some very critical terrorist
monitoring practices, it is now not a question of "if" a terrorist strike will
occur on American soil, but "when."
The question of King David should be welling up in every American's heart from
Psalm 94:16,
"Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? Or who will stand up for me
against the workers of iniquity?"
Appeasement is not peace. And only fools believe peace is about giving in or
siding with evil.
http://www.rapturealert.com/2009/100909appeasement.asp
Sunday, October 11, 2009
The Nobel Appeasement Prize
I was not going to say anything about this, but I just can't help it. I am embarrassed beyond tears by some of the things this man says, and ashamed for our country because of some of things he does.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment