I reckon you have heard about this, by now, though the mainstream media has paid pay it scant attention.
The bible says a man is know by the company he keep, and the things he does.
A quick recap from the Houston Examiner:
The Obama Justice Department has quietly ordered FBI agents to read Miranda rights to high value detainees captured and held at U.S. detention facilities in Afghanistan, according a senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. “The administration has decided to change the focus to law enforcement. Here’s the problem. You have foreign fighters who are targeting US troops today – foreign fighters who go to another country to kill Americans. We capture them…and they’re reading them their rights – Mirandizing these foreign fighters,” says Representative Mike Rogers, who recently met with military, intelligence and law enforcement officials on a fact-finding trip to Afghanistan. ..And captured foreign fighters are neither U.S. citizens nor on American soil at the time of their capture and interrogation, so the U.S. Constitution gives them no right to Miranda warnings, either.
Miranda warnings are NOT required by international law for anyone, much less enemy combatants who do not follow the rules of war. Most countries not only do not require such warnings, but regard them as being at odds with the goal of getting at the truth. Miranda warnings are not a requirement of customary international law or international human-rights law (unlike torture, which is clearly banned by treaties like the Convention Against Torture).
You don’t get Miranda-like warnings even in many European countries. (The word Miranda refers to Miranda v. Arizona, a controversial 5-to-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1966 that for the first time mandated such warnings). Even in countries that do have similar warnings, they are generally mandated only by statute or the common law, not by the country’s constitution, and thus can be rescinded at the will of the national legislature (and thus can hardly be deemed to be a universal or inalienable “human right”). French anti-terror laws are much tougher than U.S. laws like the Patriot Act.
You might remember a flash back from September 8, 2008, which is on Youtube if you care to watch it, where the President smirked and sneered at Sarah Palin and the whole idea that he would do something like this.
...And two months after his Inauguration, President Obama reiterated, "Now, do these folks deserve miranda rights? Do they deserve to be treated like a shoplifter down the block? Of course not."
So much for the smirk and sarcasm. I guess the joke's on us.
In fact, it was Sarah Palin who said at the GOP convention: "Al Qaida terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America, and he's worried that someone won't read them their rights."
This is extraordinarily stupid. As Obama himself once recognized, foreign terrorists do not have Miranda rights.
Now get mad at me. I am only echoing the President's message when he called the policeman's judgment into question during the infamous Hampton Wisconsin professor incident. And, when that was over, he invited the professor and policeman to the White House for a beer. Maybe he can do that with the terrorist. Oh, wait! I heard that Muslims don't beer.
